THE CIVIL WAR DRAFT IN PLOVER AND STEVENS POINT:
A STUDY IN EFFORTS, ATTITUDES, FRUSTRATIONS, AND RESULTS
By
David Ellison (UWSP)
The Civil War brought the first real concerted effort on the part of
the federal government to draft men into the armed forces. Both the North
and South used the draft, or more accurately, the threat of the draft,
to “muster men” into the service. The draft was at times applauded, hated,
scorned, but mostly feared. The draft also clearly served its intended
purpose - to raise an adequate amount of men to fight in the Union army,
mostly through volunteerism. This being the case, I have chosen Plover
Wisconsin as the town to discuss in terms of the effects of conscription
during the Civil War. Plover is interesting due to the fact that it was
a hotbed of patriotism and donated heavily in terms of men to the Union
cause. Plover's population in 1860 was 898, while the total population
of Portage County was 7,502. Yet, the area suffered more casualties during
the Civil War than it did during World War II when the population was four
times larger. This area, like so many others across the nation, would never
again see the majority of the men they sent to the front.
Perhaps the major problem in conducting research on Plover is the non-existence
of the Plover Times, or rather the Stanton Times and Republican
as it was called during the war years. Only scattered issues survive from
1861-1865. Consequently, I have relied on the Stevens Point papers for
first hand accounts and feelings toward the draft. So, in a way Stevens
Point is integrated into the study and complements the focus on Plover.
Besides, gaining a feeling for the times from the surrounding area can
only benefit and broaden this study. As an aside, the absence of the Stanton
Times might not have been a total loss. The Wisconsin Pinery
was at no loss for words when it commented: “The Stanton Weekly Times says
it has the largest circulation of any paper published in the county. He
is a liar. The Pinery has over double the circulation of that mean,
low lived, half supported sheet.... “ With all due respects aside, the
purpose of this paper will be to investigate the background of the draft,
as well as analyzing the public feeling and reaction as it pertained to
bounty raising, substitution, warfare, and the tangible effects of the
draft in general.
(editors note: for info on newspapers)
Before entering into the effects of the draft on Plover and Stevens
Point, I would like to set the direction of this study in its correct
historical setting by briefly discussing the impact of the war and draft
on the state of Wisconsin. Wisconsin provided over 91,000 men (1200 over
its entire quota) to the war effort. Over 11,000 of the men died in either
battle, of wounds, disease, or from events after discharge. In addition,
over $12,000,000 was spent by the state and its citizens in support of
the Union. Such an effort was basically in response to the presidential
call for troops. There were four such calls carrying with them the threat
of the draft. The first call and ensuing draft took place in the summer
of 1863. Additional drafts were conducted in the spring, 1864, the fall,
1864, and the spring, 1865. The Enrollment Act of 1863 which legalized
the draft also stipulated that all districts would be notified of their
quotas and urged to fill them before the deadline. Predating the Enrollment
Act of 1863 was the 1862 presidential call for 300,000 troops. This was
basically a state draft where the Secretary of War would instruct a governor
of a quota that had to be met. Governor Soloman was notified that if Wisconsin's
quota of 11,904 men was not met by August 15, the deficiency would be made
up through the draft. The governor proceeded to issue orders for the enrollment
of all able-bodied men aged 18 to 45. The state draft of 1862 was confined
only to those counties which did not meet their quota. These were usually
counties with heavy immigrant populations whose distaste for war stemmed
from their European experiences. Only 4,537 men were drafted, of these
19 deserted and 1,622 simply did not report.
The 1863 draft brought direct federal involvement in the draft. In Wisconsin
two classes of men were enrolled totaling 121,202. The first class included
all men liable to military service between the ages 20 and 35. The second
class included all unmarried men fit for duty above the age of 35 but below
45. Concerning Portage County, the summer call for troops and the November
draft resulted in, 27 names being drawn from Stevens Point and 1 from the
town, 4 from Sharon, 4 from Eau
Pleine, 5 from Hull, and 4 from Plover.
Vigorous attempts were made to avoid the draft in which volunteering was
seen as the most honorable route. Veterans for re-enlistment received $402,
recruits $302, and in most towns $100 was added to those amounts. The 1863
draft was not very successful. Of the 14,955 men drafted state-wide, 628
actually served, 252 hired substitutes, 6,285 were discharged for physical
reasons, 5,081 paid the $300 commutation fee, and 2,689 never reported.
While the preparations for this draft were taking place, Lincoln ordered
on October 17, 1863 another call for 300,000 men. Wisconsin's quota would
be set at 10,281 with 74,976 men of the first class enrolled for possible
military service through the country. The penalty for not filling the quota
would be as Adjutant General Agustus Gaylord stated on November 23,1863:
“If the quota above given is not filled by voluntary enlistment, a draft
is ordered by the General Government on the 5th of January 1864, to supply
the deficiency then existing. The January draft did not take place for
on February 1, 1864, Lincoln issued a call for 500,000 men which was assumed
to include the 300,000 from the October 17 call. March 14, 1864 brought
an additional call for 200,000 men. The system of extra bounties by the
towns was enough to raise enough men to negate the draft for the two calls.
Additional credits from the 1863 draft did much to further alleviate the
pressure. Try as it may, the state finally succumbed to the 500,000 call
of July 18, 1864. A draft therefore took place on September 19, 1864 resulting
in 17,534 draftees. Again, efforts to secure these men proved to be futile.
Only 2,494 were conscripted, 954 hired substitutes, 6,724 were discharged,
7,367 failed to report, and 4 men paid the $300 commutation fee. The North's
last draft was ordered to take place on March 27, 1865 for districts that
did not meet their quota. This was enough of a threat to the bounty weary
people, and the quota was narrowly achieved. On a statewide scale the draft
was not all that successful in securing men into the service. But overall,
call after call, the people of Wisconsin were able to achieve their quotas
a majority of the time. As we shall see in Plover and Stevens Point, there
was much commotion concerning the whole affair.
Before entering into the local reaction to the draft, the political
atmosphere and convictions of Plover, Portage County, and Wisconsin as
a whole must be analyzed. The 1860 and 1864 presidential elections reveal
that all three sections were firmly Republican. In the 1860 election Wisconsin
gave Lincoln 56% of the vote (86,110 votes), Douglass 43% (65,021 votes),
Breckenridge .5% (889 votes), and Bell .009% (151 votes). Portage County
gave Lincoln 64% of the vote (994 votes), Douglass 32% (471 votes), and
Breckenridge 4% (58 votes). Plover followed suit and awarded Lincoln 76%
of its vote (152 votes), while Douglass was only able to muster 24% of
the vote (47 votes). The 1864 election was just as decisive in Wisconsin
for Lincoln as the 1860 election was. Despite significant financial and
personal sacrifice, the state announced its dedication to the Union. In
1864 Lincoln drew 50% of Wisconsin's vote (82,736 votes), McClellan 39%
(65,598 votes), and the Union Majority Party 10% (17,138 votes). Portage
County gave Lincoln 69% of its vote (704 votes), and McClellan 30% (311
votes). Plover found itself 87% in favor of another term for Lincoln (138
votes), while only giving McClellan 13% of the vote (20 votes). One must
keep these figures in mind when reading the comment and opinion of the
area. While the constant call for men was indeed acutely irritating to
the populace, the area's dedication to the war and its goals were never
compromised.
Owing to the size of Plover, the town's involvement in supplying men
to the Union war effort was immense and significant. As noted, Plover's
1860 population was 898. Out of that number nearly 150 men served under
the Union flag. Twenty-one were commissioned officers, of which Colonel
James S. Alban is the most remembered. The fiery Unionist was to fall at
the battle of Pittsburgh Landing in 1862. Nevertheless, Plover has the
honor of being the “banner town” in the state for furnishing more soldiers
than any other town of its size. The Stevens Point Daily Journal
noted that, “Few communities had a record comparable to Steven’s Point’s
neighbor to the south, Plover. The village was a hot-bed of patriotism,
and one of its leading citizens, Col.
James S. Alban, was the most prominent Portage County resident to die
in the war.” Alban was the main reason for Plover's burning patriotism.
From 1856-1861, Alban, along with Jervis W. Carter published the Plover
Herald. Their impassioned stands against the slave states undoubtedly
was the main cause for Plover's high enlistment rate.’ Stevens Point was
quite envious of Plover's early positive action. On April 19, 1861 (only
a week after the shelling of Fort Sumter) Plover held a meeting to raise
men for a company. The Wisconsin State Rights exclaimed, “If the
people here, have not life enough to hold a meeting, let us go to Plover!”
In the same issue the newspaper reported that the Plover military meeting
‘Resolved, that this meeting is in favor of sustaining the President of
the United States in vigorous measures in putting down the so called southern
rebellion, and that as citizens of the United States, we will use all proper
means to do so.” Of course, J. S. Alban served as chairman of the meeting.
Stevens Point, however, had a hard time generating men to volunteer for
the service. The States Rights moaned on July 31, 1861 that while
Plover had supplied twenty-five men to date, Stevens Point with the largest
population in the area had only supplied two men with little hope of getting
any more.
While Stevens Point was having a difficult time in getting men to volunteer,
in June 1861 the city did manage to form the Home Guard of Stevens Point
with Sammuel Stevens as captain. In addition, the Pinery Rifles, under
the command of Captain James O. Raymond of Plover, left on July 7, 1861
to join the Seventh Regiment but were later incorporated into another regiment.
In addition to the Rifles, such other companies as the Evergreens and Lyon's
Pinery Battery were quickly organized. The area's logging industry was
clearly advertised in the names of these companies. Yet not all attempts
at the formation of companies met with success. A very early effort at
the formation of a company in Plover in May 1861 had to be disbanded because
all the members from Grand Rapids pulled out. Clearly then, war fever hit
Plover very early. War fever or not, the town was soon to come to a different
emotion with the onset of quotas and drafts. This is what we must now turn
our attention to.
Plover and Stevens Point were both sub districts included in Wisconsin's
Congressional Sixth District. Consequently, all quotas for the Sixth District
had to be filled by the respective sub districts. One issue of the Stanton
Times and Republican that has survived, makes much of the claim
that up to its latest printing July 4, 1863) the heavily Republican Second,
Third, and Sixth Districts had large excesses in volunteers while the slightly
Democratic Fifth District showed a small excess, and the heavily Democratic
First and Fourth Districts suffered from heavy deficiencies. Still, according
to the Adjutant General's report of 1864, the Sixth District in the 1863
draft saw 1,643 of its men drafted of which only 126 were actually inducted
into the service. The rest either failed to report, were discharged, hired
substitutes, or paid the commutation fee which totaled $182,000. In the
1864 draft Plover had a combined quota of 54 out of which 37 recruits were
submitted, 6 veterans re-enlisted, and only 4 men were drafted. Prior to
the October 17, 1863 call for troops, Plover had an excess of 8 men who
were included in the quota for 1864. Out of the 54 man quota, Plover submitted
55, leaving a credit of one man to be put towards the next draft. Portage
County as a whole received a quota of 554. The 1864 draft still did not
go over well. Evidence of gross evasion from the draft was still present.
Of the 3,764 men drafted from the Sixth District, only 722 men were actually
inducted into the army. A clear disillusionment with the draft was present
among the enrollment age men. Mixed feelings were conveyed through the
media. As we shall see, disguised emotions of trepidation color these mixed
feelings.
In the strictest interpretation of the draft, it must be acknowledged
that the draft allowed the Union to survive. Congress did anticipate public
indignation against the draft and left many opportunities of evasion open
to the draft aged man. The draftee could obtain a substitute, or even pay
the $300 commutation fee. Yet, the underlying purpose of the Civil War
draft was to act as a threat and spur volunteering rather than functioning
as an end in itself. Every community had the opportunity to raise its quota
and thus entirely avoid the draft. Indeed, Plover and Stevens Point were
able to avoid a number of the drafts. Only when the quota was not met was
the draft imposed. Consequently, as Eugene Murdock notes, “Hence the Civil
War draft, an unwelcome innovation in American life, was only a semi-draft,
a device to raise a one million man army by encouraging volunteering.”
Instructions for conducting the drawing of names for the draft were contained
in the Provost Marshall’s Regulations and were followed fairly uniformly
by all enrollment boards. Portage County's enrollment board was located
at district six headquarters in La Crosse. Names of the enrolled men were
often dropped into a wheel. A blindfolded or blind individual would then
draw the names out of the draft wheel and hand them to the commissioner
who would read the names aloud while a clerk recorded them in a book. The
drawing would continue until the quota had been met. The remaining names
would then be sealed in an envelope and stored until the next draft. Neither
the Enrollment Act nor the Regulations stated the amount of time a draftee
should be entitled to before arriving for his examination. The standard
was generally accepted as ten days. While the ten days were explained as
giving the man time to settle his affairs, many took the opportunity to
flee north to Canada.
The reaction in Stevens Point (again the absence of the Stanton Times
frustrates research) toward the draft was that of initial satisfaction,
mid-course jitters, and final condemnation. On August 2, 1862 the Wisconsin
Pinery noted that of the 300,000 men that Lincoln originally called for,
only 2,000 men were actually raised in a thirty day period. The Pinery
asked “what then is to be done?” Its answer, “We must become a military
people. Let drafting be resorted to at once. Three hundred thousand men
can thus be raised in thirty days. Lincoln, only tow days later, called
for a draft of 300,000 men to take place. The Pinery was also quick to
reassure its readers that the news of the draft was being well received
among the area's population. On August 16, 1862 the Pinery noted:
The call for 300,000 men by drafting is, so far as we can judge,
favorably received by the people at large. Some whose hearts are not right,
are disposed to find fault, from the fear that they may be caught in the
draft; but they form merely exceptional cases. The draft is welcomed by
patriotic men as being the best and surest mode of raising a full army,
and as the only method of compelling disaffected citizens to do their share
towards extricating the nation from its difficulties.
Yet, while the Pinery extolled the patriotic virtues of abiding
with and whole-heartedly accepting the reality of the draft, the newspaper
nonetheless expressed latent fears about the draft actually being imposed
upon the area. The Pinery in November 1863 urged the people of Stevens
Point to copy other local areas (Plover? in raising their quotas, “or else
we shall have the draft upon us with all its hardships....” Furthermore,
apathy would only lash the draft upon the city “with all its obnoxious
accomplishments. Let us avoid it while there is yet time.” The Wisconsin
Lumberman on December 21,1863 reported a town meeting at the offices
of Messrs: Eaton and Alban in order to raise a bounty for volunteers. The
paper reminded the people of the $700 that had already been raised and
that $200 more was expected in order to raise the needed volunteers, so
that “our quota will be full, and our city saved from the draft.” Stevens
Point during the Civil War seemed to be in a similar quandary as we are
in the twentieth century concerning taxes. We either call for or against
increased taxes with the belief that the results will improve our lifestyles.
Nevertheless, we often bemoan the strain on our pockets when taxes are
raised and complain of the lack of services when taxes are cut. This seemed
to be the same mentality that prevailed in this area 120 years ago. The
newspapers continuously called for and supported the draft as a needed
measure for the safety of the Union. Yet, at the same time they feared
and resented its effects on the community. There is further proof of this
mentality. After the Pinery had denounced the “obnoxious” effect
of the draft in 1863, it nonetheless on January 6, 1865 commented: “Let
Congress at once urge upon the president the necessity of a further draft
V of 800,000 men, and we will be able to put into the field before the
dawn of spring, trustworthy, reliable, soldiers and with a series of decisive
victories will assuredly trample the rebellion to the dust.” It is interesting
to note to what extremes the papers reported efforts to recruit men during
lulls on their reporting on the draft. The Lumberman reported that
Captain W. Van Myers (a long time recruiter in the area) even went so far
as to promising that he could enlist some “stalwart Indians” if the need
for men became desperate enough. The Lumberman of course extended
the best of luck to the good captain. Finally, when victory was assured
and tensions eased, the area news media found its golden opportunity to
severely thrash the draft. On April 7, 1865 the Pinery, which as recently
as January 6, 1865 had called for another draft of 800,000 men, unleashed
this attack:
The experience of this war ought never to be lost to us, as
we may drift into another of equal dimensions. The almost absolute failure
of the provost marshal's method of conscription, apart from its inequality
and unpopularity, shows us that such a system of recruitment is both unwise,
costly, and unreliable.
True, the draft was by no means a well executed concept. Yet, the Pinery
ignored
one important fact: the draft and the fear it created, stimulated the people
of the North to reach their quotas (most of the time) and field armies
that ultimately proved victorious. Relying on a purely volunteer army during
a time of war, especially in a state such as Wisconsin where the physical
threat of the war was remote, would have proved futile.
The draft was an all too real possibility for the residents of Plover
and Stevens Point. At this point I would like to take a look at what measures
the two towns took to forestall the effects of the draft upon their communities.
In the early years of little gain militarily for the North, many saw the
need to enlarge the Union's war effort. The draft of course was the obvious
solution. Malcolm Rosholt notes that Stevens Point and the surrounding
communities held many special town meetings in order to raise bounties
for volunteers. This indeed was the fact. Yet he goes on to say that the
bounty money rarely motivated men to take up the offer because many of
the offers were later withdrawn due to the confusion over draft quotas.
He blames the fault not on the town boards but rather on the chaotic draft
system. Another aspect of the difficulties in raising bounties was that
at times it was almost impossible to collect from the pledgers. In addition,
as the war progressed weariness resulting from the continual call for troops
depressed the people. Naturally, with each successive call for troops the
effort to raise the needed bounties became grudgingly more difficult. This
was particularly the case with Plover as we shall see.
The bounty was simply a sum of money offered to any eligible man for
volunteering. Bounties existed on the federal, state and more importantly,
local levels. The bounty usually took the form of $50, $200, $300, $1000
cash amounts that would only be paid to the man after he volunteered. As
Eugene Murdock notes, “It had the expected results, men volunteered, and
it became the standard method of obtaining troops. Even discharged veterans
who had enlisted for ‘love of country’ in 1861 caught the fever and re-enlisted
for ‘love of money’ in 1864.” The first recorded special town meeting held
in Plover in order to raise bounty money was held March 24, 1864. The town
records state that “A Special Town Meeting was held at the Court House
in Plover for the purpose of voting on the proposal of raising a tax of
$1200 to be used in paying Bounties to volunteers who shall enlist in the
United States Services and hereafter be credited to Plover.” The vote turned
out 103 votes in favor of the tax and only 10 against. The tax carried.
An entry in Simon Sherman’s diary for March 24, 1864 notes “Goes and votes
on soldiers bounty tax.” It seems Sherman was an active participant in
the various bounty tax efforts in Plover. More importantly, his diary entries
confirm and back up much recorded information. The second bounty tax meeting
was announced on August 1, 1864 and held on August 8. This time around
the tax was levied at $1000 and participating voters fell from the March
1864 level of 113 to only 82. Nonetheless, the tax passed 54 to 28, with
only a 65% passage rate as opposed to the 90% passage rate in March. Simon
Sherman proved to be quite active after the bounty tax passage. On August
12 he served on a committee to locate volunteers. August 13 found him soliciting
subscriptions for the soldiers. Again, on August 14 he accompanied a man
named Dumbard in the collection of subscriptions. Finally, on August 15
he attended another solders meeting and paid his $40.00 subscription fee
to the bounty fund.
Plover was in for one more bounty tax meeting and the event took place
on February 11, 1865. At this meeting $3000 was proposed to be raised as
a bounty and to be collected “at the usual time of collecting taxes in
1865”. The total number of votes cast was up this time to 111 of which
65 votes were for the tax and 46 votes against it. Again, the passage rate
at 60% was down from the previous two votes. Sherman notes that on February
11 he attended the town meeting that was to pass the $3000 bounty tax and
that on February 16 while attending a war meeting he received a bill from
the legislature legalizing A. O. Warner and his official act in South District
Number 4, Plover. I could not discover what this act entailed. As in 1864,
Sherman paid his $40.00 bounty fee and $1.00 fee for expenses on March
6, 1865 (most likely tax time). We know from Sherman’s accounts that bounty
taxes were paid (at least in part) during the August 1864 and February
1865 subscription efforts. For the March 1864 bounty tax one can only guess.
In my opinion the taxes were most likely paid in full. Out of the three
bounty tax efforts only one, the August 1864 quota, was not met. A further
interesting trend in the bounty tax voting in Plover was the successive
weakening of the “yea” vote in the passage of the bounty taxes. In each
vote the percentage of passage diminished. Surely the people were getting
weary of the taxes, but the prevailing feeling must have been that it was
more honorable to pay the bounty than to submit to the disgraceful draft.
The records do reveal that Plover did have a few men drafted. Assuredly,
such occurrences did not go over very well.
As in Plover, Stevens Point was equally as active in raising bounty
money. The city papers abound with notices for bounty meetings, advertisements
urging young men to enlist, and steady reminders to the citizens of how
much money had been raised. One must keep in mind that fewer than 50,000
men were actually drafted into the service during the Civil War. Yet, as
we have seen, the purpose of the Enrollment Act was to stimulate volunteers
through the threat of the draft. The threat of conscription was not enough,
and in Stevens Point, Plover, and thousands of other communities across
the North monetary inducements had to be offered. During an August 4, 1864
town meeting the Stevens Point town board decided to take an innovative
measure to raise needed bounty money. The board drew up a list of all eligible
men for the draft and held them accountable to pay a $50 bounty tax each.
The rationale was as follows: “It especially commends itself to the notice
of those amongst us, liable to the draft, and who are not able to hire
a substitute. A man who is able to employ a substitute, taking all the
risks of scanty and advance in prices, need not fear for the draft. except
as it touches his pocket.” So, the poorer men who could not pay the high
price for a substitute had only to pay the $50 (smaller amounts were accepted).
Even if only half of the men paid the $50 enough money would have been
raised to induce volunteers and meet the quota. The result of the August
4 bounty meeting was to enable Captain Van Myers to enlist 65 to 70 men
and give Stevens Point a 10 man credit. The town was so pleased with the
results that it decided to “give a Grand Dance to the boys who had enlisted
with Captain Van Myers on next Friday evening, at Curtis’ Hall.” As a further
jab at those men who did not pay their $50, The Lumberman listed
their names and labeled them as “sneaks”.
The last great effort in Stevens Point to raise a bounty was conducted
between February 3 and March 3, 1865. By February 3 the city had raised
$500 in cash. There were high hopes of raising a few thousand dollars more
so as to guarantee each volunteer a $300 cash bounty. There is also a reference
to a Lieutenant MeGran having already enlisted around 45 men and there
seems to have been a need to add to that number in order to avoid the draft.
Interest in raising the bounties was reflected at the February 3 meeting
in a large turnout and the many “spicy speeches” that were given. By March
3 an impressive $6,400 was raised in the city. Evidently the bounty money
had to be taken to Madison where it would be distributed to the volunteers.
The financial account of the trio to Madison to deliver the money to Captain
MeGran (recently promoted) records that: $5,700 was paid to the 19 men
who enlisted; MeGran received $500 for his three years service to the area;
and the rest ($200) was used as traveling expenses for the committee to
and from Madison.
Substitution also played a significant role in the execution of the
draft. Substitution was a perfectly legal evasion of the draft and was
listed under section 13 of the Enrollment Act of 1863. An individual would
simply hire and pay someone to serve in his place. If a man could afford
a substitute and had a hard time locating one he could contact a substitute
broker who would locate one for him. Yet as long as commutation (paying
the federal government not to serve in the army) stayed in effect. Substitutes
could usually be acquired for $300. Only after commutation was canceled
in 1864 did substitute prices soar. With the high prices demanded for substitutes,
one can see the practicality of Stevens Point's efforts to get its men
to pay $50 towards volunteers rather than paying $300 for a substitute.
Family men often took the opportunity to hire substitutes because they
did not want to leave their families behind. Those who did enlist placed
the town board responsible for their families’ welfare. Consequently on
November 23, 1861, the County Board agreed to give $2 per month for each
child under 14 whose father had joined the services as of November 1, 186l.
Sherman offers some insight into local substitution practices. On August
21, 1864 he notes that “E. D. Brown and G. Anderson come and they get their
substitutes for about $400.00 dollars for one year." The reason why the
two men paid more than the usual $300 for a substitute was that in July
1864 commutation was abolished due to public pressure. Many people viewed
commutation as merely a way for the rich to avoid serving in the army while
the poor fought and died in battle. The result was that with the end of
commutation substitutes could now raise their Prices. The Pinery
also announced on December 24, 1864 that substitution would be ended in
the next draft. The paper explained why and also found time to chastise
its readers:
It is now asserted that the lack of full ranks is to be attributed
to the wholesale desertion of bounty jumpers and others who go as substitutes.
Consequently in the coming draft. the provision of substitution will be
withdrawn and personal service of the conscript required as the only method
of filling up the ranks... .We have none to blame but ourselves for men
in many localities, instead of equalizing the chances of the draft, by
aiding in the enrollment and thereby augmenting the number to be drawn,
have done everything in their power to encumber the enrolling officer and
to aid in the desertion of those declared for service.
The Pinery also suggested a solution to the problem by taking action against
the broker who had proven that he was aware of the desertion of the men
that he had provided as substitutes. The plan called for “Instead of sending
the swindlers to orison, place them in the front.” Perhaps the plan to
withdraw substitution was later canceled or simply ignored, for on March
25. 1865 Simon Sherman recorded that he hired Hugh Jones as a substitute
and paid him $300. The other major way of avoiding the draft, besides fleeing
to Canada was physical mutilation. In my research I came across only one
entry pertaining to this practice. The Pinery noted on August 23,
1862 that “a woman, not many miles from this village, fearing that her
husband was to be drafted, took occasion to deliver him of two of his five
digits.” Owing to the lack of these reports, one can conclude that physical
mutilation was probably not practiced that often except on occasion to
fail the draft induction physical examination. There were too many other
ways of avoiding the draft than cutting oneself to pieces.
With so many avenues open to the evasion of military service, it should
not be a surprise that after the initial rush to enlist in 1861 and 1862,
volunteering drastically fell off. The war took on the reputation of lasting
forever with mounting casualties catching everyone's eye. This very breakdown
in volunteerism led to the initiation of the draft along with publicly
appeasing evasion clauses in 1863. During the first two years of the war
there was a clear apathy among the men of Stevens Point to enlist in the
army. The papers did much to try to end this complacency. The Pinery
in 1862 urged the youth of the town to enlist and wrote: "There are many
young men in our town and vicinity idle; a good opportunity is now offered
them to serve their country and at the same time fill their empty purses
(the federal enlistment bonus).” Again, only a month later the Pinery
was
still urging its men to join the company that Captain Yates of the U.S.
Army was forming. The term of service would be three years at $586 a year
with all expenses paid. Pay was also guaranteed every two months. The Pinery
stated: “It certainly seems to us better to have steady work at good paying
rates, than to work two months at high prices and be obliged to be idle
until every cent is spent before another job can be had.” Not only
does this passage reflect the need for more men to enlist, but it also
sheds some light on the economic situation of the area during the early
Civil War years. There hardly seemed to be adequate full time employment.
Nonetheless, with the passage of the Enrollment Act, there was plenty of
money to be had. With the creation of the draft all three levels of government
paid bounties, and there were also donations from private individuals and
groups at quota-raising rallies. A recruit could conceivably receive money
from all three levels of government. He was guaranteed the federal bounty,
local bounties varied in size, and most states (Wisconsin included) provided
an additional bounty. A substitute could not receive the federal bounty
at any time during the war. The growth in the amount of bounties increased
as the war progressed. On November 15, 1862, months after the initial call
for the draft, the Pinery advertised, “$100 Bounty is offered those
who volunteer... .Let it not be said, hereafter. That your name was among
those who were drafted.... “ By 1865, the local bounty was to climb to
$300.
Before ending this study I would briefly like to share the limited information
that I discovered on the arrival of the Board of Enrollment officers to
Stevens Point and the reaction to their visit. Exemption due to personal
or physical problems was the final method of evading the draft. Keep in
mind that during the 1863 draft 695 of the 1,643 drafted men from district
six were discharged after being drafted. Likewise, in the 1864 draft in
district six. 1,548 of the 3,764 men drafted were subsequently discharged.
In both cases, discharge after the draft was the most popular form of evasion.
The officers were in Stevens Point January 12-14. 1865 for the examination
of men from Portage and Marathon counties. The officers were well received
in Stevens Point. The Lumberman expressed the feelings of those
involved by noting:
In the social circle, a better or jollier set of fellows never
drank your health, or joined the laugh or the song. They left a pleasant
impression upon the minds of our community, and our good wishes shall follow
them where ever they go, even if they should “draft us into the army.”
All well and said, yet this passage hardly reflects the true feelings of
the area toward the draft. Below the feelings of good will and the “save
the Union” mentality, there was a sense of direct contempt for the draft
which was one of the very measures to save the Union. One can clearly detect
a feeling of alienation toward a system which many perceived as being a
less than honorable way to conduct a military operation.
My original intention for this project was to focus exclusively on the
draft and its effects on Plover. As is evident, Stevens Point has been
unavoidably drawn into the study for the sole reason that the only surviving
newspapers from the Civil War years are from Stevens Point. I believe the
integration of the information from both towns work with and complement
each other and thus produce a more comprehensive investigation of what
really happened in this area during the Civil War years. Through-out my
research, I was impressed with both towns’ tenacity in attempting to provide
men for the war effort. Likewise, the inability and at times refusal of
some people to contribute toward the bounty, and the efforts to frustrate
the enlistment of men cannot be ignored. As in most cases there is more
than just one side to any issue. I believe it is important to note again
that the purpose of the draft was to stimulate volunteerism through the
threat of conscription. As a concession to public opinion, Congress did
allow numerous avenues of legal evasion. Again, only 50,000 men were drafted
during the Civil War. The people of Plover and Stevens Point were well
aware of their obligation to the federal government and did all they could
to raise the needed bounties and therefore the volunteers to fill their
quotas. Yet, beneath all the calls for patriotism and further drafts. There
was a deep-seated resentment toward the draft. Then, even more than now,
the draft was viewed as dishonorable. I hope that my efforts have helped
to illuminate not only the tangible results of the draft on the area (in
terms of bounty meetings, volunteers enlisted, and money raised) but more
importantly the intangible results found in such areas as feelings and
attitudes. Involvement and participation, and the mixed emotions and frustrations
that were exhibited. Whereas I did not find any references to draft riots
or blatant Protests against the draft, there was definitely an underlying.
subliminal if you may, anti-draft message in most of the newspaper articles
pertaining to the draft. Indeed, many of our present attitudes and resentments
toward the draft can trace their beginnings to the numerous Civil War drafts.
Attitudes and convictions are clearly slow to change.
|